ABSTRACT
With respect to the treatment of the individual who repeatedly displays antisocial behavior, several programs claim to have achieved behavioral change by using the dynamics of the interpersonal relationship and group interaction occurring within the institutional setting (Aichorn, 1935; Bettelheim, 1950; McCorkle, 1958; Polsky, 1962; Redl and Wineman, 1952). Although these programs differ they all have some characteristics in common. In the first place each is derived from, or closely associated with, psychoanalytic theory. The emphasis clearly is placed on psychic or psychodynamic processes rather than overt behavior. Second, it is felt that internal disturbances can be modified through the establishment of close, accepting interpersonal relationships enabling the individual to “work through” his problems. Thus, the programs involve considerable permissiveness, acceptance and reward 230(reinforcement). Individuals are encouraged to express themselves freely and openly and within very broad limits; punishment and censure are avoided. It is hypothesized that since internal conflict developed out of previous punitive interpersonal relationships, any response to antisocial behavior which involved punishment would make the individual more defensive (suspicious, hostile) and less capable of developing adaptive interpersonal relationships. Thus, it is assumed that antisocial behavior must occur with impunity.
