ABSTRACT
This chapter compares insights from Avidicus project phases 1 and 2 and applies the findings to the analysis of an authentic video recording of a court case involving a hearing of a witness conducted via videoconference between Brussels and Innsbruck. The study focuses on the role of the interpreter and the judge and presents a detailed analysis (using ELAN software) of nonverbal communication such as gaze, facial expression and posture (kinesic elements). These elements were firstly categorised by means of three different models under the BAP (Body Action and Posture) coding system: posture, gesture and gaze, before being allocated a specific function. Finally, the most salient examples of nonverbal communication were examined in conjunction with the transcript of the proceedings in order to determine the extent to which they confirmed or contradicted the verbalisations of the witness. We posit that although these different taxonomies used in the analysis derive from different research traditions or types of analysis (e.g. video clips, short interviews), they are of great value for analysing any type of nonverbal communication, including nonverbal behaviour by interpreters or other participants in the legal encounter.
